Clinical Trial: Comparing Asthma Action Plans for Pediatric Asthma
This study is currently recruiting patients.
Verified by Children''''s Mercy Hospital Kansas City August 2005
| Sponsors and Collaborators: | Children''''s Mercy Hospital Kansas City Katherine B. Anderson Associates Endowment Fund | | Information provided by: | Children''''s Mercy Hospital Kansas City | | ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00136305 | |
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the relative effectiveness of two asthma action plans (pictorial vs. written) in terms of asthma action plan knowledge, medication use, and family satisfaction with asthma education.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
Asthma
| Device: Pictorial asthma action plan
| Phase II
|
MedlinePlus related topics: Asthma
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Relative Effectiveness of Pictorial and Written Asthma Action Plans for Pediatric Asthma
Further Study Details:
Primary Outcomes: after one month: scores on the Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview and Family Satisfaction Survey, and
mean daily adherence to controller medication and total number of puffs of rescue medication inhaled
Expected Total Enrollment: 80
Study start: August 2005
Asthma medical regimens are complex for families, requiring changes in the types and amounts of medication based on the frequency and intensity of symptoms. Written asthma action plans (AAP’s) are commonly used to provide a set of instructions to help parents and children implement these complicated regimens. However, written AAP’s require substantial literacy levels, so for younger children, low-literacy families, or non-English speaking families, a pictorial version of the
AAP may be more understandable and useful. The study aims to validate a newly developed, fully pictorial
AAP in terms of its relative impact on parent- and child-reported knowledge of the action plan, medication use, and parent- and child-reported satisfaction, when compared to a standard-care written AAP.
Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study: 6 Years - 18 Years, Genders Eligible for Study: Both
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who are new patients
- Receive a diagnosis of persistent asthma
- Are in need of an asthma action plan
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with intermittent asthma
- An established patient who already has an asthma action plan
- Not English or Spanish speaking
Location and Contact Information
Please refer to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00136305
Missouri The Children''''s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States; Recruiting
Montserrat M Graves, MA 816-234-3674 mcmitchell@cmh.edu
Montserrat M Graves, MA, Sub-Investigator
Study chairs or principal investigators
Christina D Adams, PhD, Principal Investigator, The Children''''s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
More Information
Study ID Numbers: 04 08-102E; KBR 01.4182
Last Updated: August 26, 2005
Record first received: August 26, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00136305
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2005-08-30
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Cache Date: August 31, 2005