Stroke |
Brain Attack; Carotid Endarterectomy; Cerebrovascular Disease |
Clinical Trial: Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for Upper Extremity Recovery in Stroke
This study is not yet open for patient recruitment.
Verified by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) August 2005
|
Purpose
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke, Acute Stroke Hemiparesis | Device: NMES device with EMG-triggered and Cyclic capabilities | Phase II |
MedlinePlus related topics: Neurologic Diseases; Stroke
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Official Title: Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Stroke
Secondary Outcomes: Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) - hemiparetic arm-specific measure of activity limitation given on 6 occasions as above: at baseline, mid-treatment, end of treatment, and follow-up at 1-,3- and 6-months post-treatment.
Expected Total Enrollment: 189
Study start: October 2005; Expected completion: June 2009
Last follow-up: March 2009; Data entry closure: May 2009
Stroke is the leading cause of activity limitation among older adults in the United States. NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) can be used by stroke survivors who do not have enough residual movement to take part in volitional active repetitive movement therapy and does not require expensive equipment or skilled personnel. Two types of NMES are available. The first is cyclic NMES, which electrically activates paretic muscles at a set duty cycle for a preset time period. The patient is a passive participant and does not assist the NMES by volitionally contracting the muscle during stimulation. The second type encompasses various forms of NMES in combination with biofeedback. For example, in "EMG-triggered" NMES, subjects are "rewarded" with stimulation in response to successful attempts to reach a pre-set level of EMG activity in the affected muscle. There is increased cognitive input and involvement on the part of the patient. The purpose of this study is to first demonstrate the effectiveness of these two types of surface stimulation on decreasing motor impairment and activity limitation; the study also seeks to assess the effect of adding cognitive input to NMES to reduce motor impairment and activity limitation.
Study subjects will be acute stroke survivors. They will participate for a total of eight months, beginning during their hospital stay, and continuing after hospital discharge. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups and will receive stimulation accordingly: 1) Cyclic stimulation; 2) EMG-triggered stimulation; and 3) Sensory-only stimulation (control). Members of each treatment group will be given an appropriate NMES device to use for three 30-minute treatment sessions per day, five times per week for eight weeks; for a total of 120 treatment sessions. Stimulation will be applied to ECR and EDC (wrist and finger extensors) on the affected arm. A treatment therapist will visit the patient in the hospital (or at home after discharge) on a weekly basis to monitor subject compliance and to provide feedback on device usage. The primary outcome measure will be the upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA), a measure of motor impairment. The Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) is a hemiparetic arm-specific measure of activity limitation, and will serve as a secondary outcome measure.
In addition to the baseline visit on day of enrollment, subjects will complete these outcome measurements at the clinic on five other occasions: at mid-treatment (week 4); end of treatment (week 8); and for follow-up visits at one-, three- and six-months post-treatment.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
• Ages 55 to 80 • Evidence of clinical symptoms from a hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke with all symptoms from previous stroke(s) clinically resolved • Medically stable • Moderate to mild unilateral hemiparesis • Follow 2-stage commands consistently • Sufficient hearing to hear the audio cue that will be used during treatment • Less than 12 weeks post-stroke • Full passive ROM at the wrist and all MCP joints • Subject can extend his/her affect wrist against gravity at least 10 degrees beyond neutral • Subject has MRC ≤ 4 for wrist extensors • Intact skin on the hemiparetic arm • Score of 18 or below on the Geriatric Depression Scale • Can tolerate NMES to the ECR and EDS for full wrist and finger extension • Average AMAT functional ability score ≤ 3.5 • Demonstrates presence of volitionally activated EMG signal from the paretic ECR of at least 5 μV in magnitude
Exclusion Criteria:
• History of ventricular arrhythmias or any other arrhythmias (i.e. fast atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, or supraventricular tachycardia) with hemodynamic instability • History of other upper motor neuron lesion • Ipsilateral lower motor neuron lesion • Edema in the affected limb • Pregnancy • Uncontrolled seizure disorder • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score below the 4th quartile on age-adjusted norms • Implanted stimulator (such as a pacemaker)
Location and Contact Information
Peggy Maloney, RN 216-778-8563 mmaloney@metrohealth.org
Ohio
MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Peggy Maloney, RN 216-778-8563 mmaloney@metrohealth.org
John Chae, ME, MD, Principal Investigator
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Stephen J Page, Ph.D., FAHA, Principal Investigator
John Chae, ME, MD, Principal Investigator, MetroHealth Medical Center
More Information
Publications
Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jun;77(6):549-53.
Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke. 1998 May;29(5):975-9.
Powell J, Pandyan AD, Granat M, Cameron M, Stott DJ. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke. 1999 Jul;30(7):1384-9.
Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Lewis G, Pang S. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 May;79(5):570-5.
Cauraugh J, Light K, Kim S, Thigpen M, Behrman A. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1360-4.
Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke. 2002 Jun;33(6):1589-94.
Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE, Nilsson CG, Viitanen M. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998 Jun;30(2):95-9.
Sonde L, Kalimo H, Fernaeus SE, Viitanen M. Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Feb;14(1):14-9.
Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Nov;60(11):497-502.
Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Mar;73(3):220-7.
Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey LL, Lojovich JM, Carey JR. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(4):450-60. Epub 2003 Nov 15.
Last Updated: September 1, 2005
Record first received: August 31, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00142792
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2005-09-06

Not Signed In -


