Coronary Artery Bypass Graft |
CABG |
Clinical Trial: Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Study
This study is no longer recruiting patients.
|
Purpose
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Coronary Arteriosclerosis | Procedure: Coronary artery bypass | Phase III |
MedlinePlus related topics: Coronary Disease
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Bio-equivalence Study
Official Title: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Used as Free Aorto-Coronary Grafts in Coronary Revascularisation
Secondary Outcomes: Safety/efficacy assessment; Physiological assessment of the randomized graft at angiography
Expected Total Enrollment: 200
Study start: May 1998
Arteries differ from veins both in morphology and physiology. Thus the way they behave as in vivo conduits when used in coronary artery bypass grafting is also likely to be different. This may partly explain the predisposition of veins used as coronary conduits to accelerated atherosclerosis in comparison with the internal mammary artery grafts. There are presently few data describing the properties of the radial artery as an in-vivo coronary conduit over the longer-term.
The study will compare angiographic patency of the radial artery or saphenous vein graft anastomosed to the native left circumflex coronary territory at 3 months and 5 years after surgery. A substudy will compare 5-year post-surgery diameter and blood flow of in-vivo radial artery and saphenous vein grafts in response to endothelium-dependent and non-endothelium-dependent stimuli when patients attend for their scheduled follow-up angiogram.
Eligibility
Inclusion Criteria:
- on waiting list for clinically-indicated myocardial revascularization surgery
- aged 40-70 years
- significant stenosis (≥70%) in the circumflex territory as identified on preoperative angiograms
- negative Allen''''s test (defined as the return of palmar circulation within 5 seconds of releasing ulnar artery compression)
- willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Location Information
United Kingdom
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
Neil E Moat, MS, FRCS, Principal Investigator, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust
More Information
Last Updated: August 30, 2005
Record first received: August 30, 2005
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00139399
Health Authority: United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on 2005-09-13

Not Signed In -


